Skip to content
SStackSwitch

Open source vs Open source

Supabase vs PocketBase: Which One Should You Choose in 1970?

Supabase is a open source Backend as a Service (BaaS) tool priced as freemium / Usage-based / Open-Source, starting at $25/mo (Pro tier) or Free Self-Hosted. PocketBase is open source, priced as free (MIT), no official managed cloud, starting at $0 (self-hosted single binary).

Quick verdict

Choose Supabase for
Supabasefull power of standard PostgreSQL with Row Level Security (RLS)
Choose PocketBase for
PocketBaseone executable with SQLite, auth, realtime subscriptions and an admin UI

Supabase vs PocketBase: feature comparison

FeatureSupabaseOpen SourceSelf-HostablePocketBaseOpen SourceSelf-Hostable
Open-Source AvailableYesYes
Self-HostableYesYes
Self-Hosting DifficultyLow (Official Docker template)Low (one executable plus SQLite)
Pricing ModelFreemium / Usage-based / Open-SourceFree (MIT), no official managed cloud
Starting Price$25/mo (Pro tier) or Free Self-Hosted$0 (self-hosted single binary)
Free TierFree Cloud plan: 500MB database, 50,000 monthly active usersUnlimited self-hosted under MIT
GitHub Stars75k61.6k

Pricing takeaway

Supabase starts at $25/mo (Pro tier) or Free Self-Hosted (free Cloud plan: 500MB database, 50,000 monthly active users). PocketBase starts at $0 (self-hosted single binary) (unlimited self-hosted under MIT).

Supabase
Freemium / Usage-based / Open-Source. Starts at $25/mo (Pro tier) or Free Self-Hosted. Free Cloud plan: 500MB database, 50,000 monthly active users.Full Supabase pricing breakdown
PocketBase
Free (MIT), no official managed cloud. Starts at $0 (self-hosted single binary). Unlimited self-hosted under MIT.Full PocketBase pricing breakdown

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Full power of standard PostgreSQL with Row Level Security (RLS)
  • Built-in Authentication, Edge Functions, Realtime, and S3-compatible Storage
  • Easy migration: plain standard SQL with zero proprietary lock-in

Cons

  • Free tier projects pause after 1 week of inactivity
  • Edge functions support TypeScript/Deno only
  • Free projects pause after a week of inactivity, and heavy usage needs paid compute add-ons

Pros

  • One executable with SQLite, auth, realtime subscriptions and an admin UI
  • Backups are a single database file copy
  • MIT licensed with no vendor account, billing or seat count

Cons

  • SQLite limits horizontal scaling under very high write load
  • No official managed offering, so uptime and backups are yours
  • Young plugin ecosystem compared with Supabase or Appwrite

Supabase vs PocketBase: FAQ

Is PocketBase a good alternative to Supabase?

Supabase is a open source Backend as a Service (BaaS) tool priced as freemium / Usage-based / Open-Source, starting at $25/mo (Pro tier) or Free Self-Hosted. PocketBase is open source, priced as free (MIT), no official managed cloud, starting at $0 (self-hosted single binary).

Which is cheaper, Supabase or PocketBase?

Supabase starts at $25/mo (Pro tier) or Free Self-Hosted (free Cloud plan: 500MB database, 50,000 monthly active users). PocketBase starts at $0 (self-hosted single binary) (unlimited self-hosted under MIT).

Is Supabase or PocketBase open source?

Supabase is open source (github.com/supabase/supabase). PocketBase is open source (github.com/pocketbase/pocketbase).

Can I self-host Supabase or PocketBase?

Supabase can be self-hosted. Difficulty: Low (Official Docker template). PocketBase can be self-hosted. Difficulty: Low (one executable plus SQLite).

Do Supabase and PocketBase have a free tier?

Supabase: Free Cloud plan: 500MB database, 50,000 monthly active users. PocketBase: Unlimited self-hosted under MIT.